How is unlimited economic growth possible

Apply market research to generate audience insights. Measure content performance. Develop and improve products. List of Partners vendors. Your Money. Personal Finance. Your Practice. Popular Courses. Economy Economics. Key Takeaways Economic growth is often associated with environmental degradation. Improvement in quality of life is what drives the desire for economic growth.

However, economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. Separating economic growth from physical growth can help attain higher standards of living without unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. Article Sources. Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate.

You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.

Compare Accounts. The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace. Related Articles. Economics Top 25 Developed and Developing Countries. Economics Capital as a Factor of Production. Macroeconomics Is Industrialization Good for the Economy?

Economics Is Economics a Science? Partner Links. Solow presented a new model of growth that excluded land, inadvertently cutting the natural world out of modern growth theory. The new model instead focused on the contributions of capital, labor and technical progress.

Solow, his colleagues and other economists were so focused on inputs that they did not imagine the possibility of outputs, such as waste and pollution, growing to be so consequential that they would impact the ecosystem integrity and thus economic growth. The belief of infinite economic growth is a fallacy and one that nations have used as an excuse not to address climate change.

As Jones says, we need to return to the previous theory of economic growth, which is more suited to our current times and one that dispels the fantasy of infinite growth on a finite planet. In both cases the economy exploded, but the size of our foot print shrunk. As we move more things from real space into the cloud, the economy will grow, and our physical presence will shrink. Hi Voice of Reason. The real fallacy, I think, is that no on really understands physics, and no one really understands economics.

I'd wager, though, that most economists would agree with that statement, and most physicists would not. A basic understanding of urbanism - how humans arrange themselves on the landscape - is useful here. While increased energy use appears to have gone hand in hand with 20thC economic growth, we also sprawled horribly in that time. Fortunately the story of the 21st Century will be the rediscovery of traditional urbanism, of how we arranged ourselves on the land - arrangements discovered through thousands of years of trial and error - prior to , following the realisation that that arrangement coupled with modern sanitation, street surfacing materials and mass electric transit reflects innate evolved human psychological preferences like sociability, refuge and prospect, freedom of choice etc.

Energy use does not ineluctably correlate with economic growth, and often it doesn't even correlate well with quality of life. A little walkable car-free neighborhood of thin streets, durable buildings that share walls and capture sunlight consumes far less energy than an area the same size in NYC or San Jose. Humans in general don't want to live in cities: they gathered into cities because communication was limited to the speed of foot or horse, so they had to live in close proximity.

As faster transport - rail and then automobile - became available, those who could afford the new technology began the process of sprawl. Now that communication makes it increasingly possible to do many jobs from anywhere on the planet, what use are cities?

We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity. The same Jean-Luc Picard with a wealthy collection of artifacts. How very old fashioned and materialistic of him. What, then, must ultimately increase for an economy to display real growth?

Logically incorrect: because exponential economic growth is not the same as exponential energy growth it follows that exponential economic growth is possible. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this article if all the arguments concerning energy growth are valid is about the relation between energy growth and economic growth.

Economic growth in itself might be less dependent on resource use but it doesn't follow that unending exponential economic growth is possible. It's where all the economists go wrong all the time:.

The correct argument should be that unending exponential growth in itself in any system is unsustainable. That's all we know from science. So why should exponential economic growth be any different than other observed examples of exponential growth? The "boil the Earth" example sounds weirdly familiar.

In I was working for a company that created software to design computer chips. We often had academic researchers give presentations on advances in semiconductor design. One presenter began by showing the historic growth of power consumption of a typical CPU used in desktops, laptops, etc. One way of expressing power consumption in semiconductors is in watts per square centimeter.

He claimed that if historic rates continued, by the power consumption of a CPU would, in watts per square centimeter, exceed that produced by a nuclear reactor. He then went on to describe various techniques he was researching to reduce power consumption while continuing to increase computing capacity.

At least some of these techniques must have been put into practice by now, which may be why your latest iPad doesn't burn your house down. How likely is it that this conversation is happening in more than one universe? Should we worry more about Covid or about nuclear war?

Is economics a form Every year, thousands of people in the U. Bapu talks The U.